Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Can Ordinary Americans Develop a More Effective Democracy
. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 4 page paper tries to answer the question: Can Ordinary Americans Develop a More Effective Democracy? This paper relates the fact that when our Founding Fathers created the Constitution, one of the central dictums of the preamble was that if the government stopped working for the people, that another form of democratic government should be developed in its place. Most agree it can't happen. One of the fundamental reasons that this is the case is because it can be argued that ordinary Americans do not have enough of the qualities needed to develop a more effective democracy. In order to understand this argument, then, it is beneficial to consider some of the perspectives of a number of theorists, including James Madison, Gabriel Almond, Sidney Verba, Fareed Zakaria and de Toqueville. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: MH11_MHAmeri.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
should be developed in its place. Over the centuries, then, questions have been raised about whether the government meets the needs of the people, but structures in place
seem to have taken control, and few can argue that the American government can be easily dispersed and in its place another form of democracy could be created. One
of the fundamental reasons that this is the case is because it can be argued that ordinary Americans do not have enough of the personal and psychological qualities needed to
develop a more effective democracy. In addition, the American elite, who have benefited from the structure of the government, also lack the qualities to make such a transition.
In order to understand this argument, then, it is beneficial to consider some of the perspectives of a number of theorists, including James Madison, Gabriel Almond, Sidney Verba, Fareed Zakaria
and de Toqueville, all of whom considered the issue of democracy and the limitations of members of society. James Madison authored Federalist No.
51, which outlines the importance of a Federal system based on checks and balances. Essentially, Madison recognized that an unchecked leadership could inherently take control over the country, and
so the development of the three branches of government and the distribution of power reduces the chances of too much control falling into one mans hands. Madison writes:
"But the great security against gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal
motives to resist encroachments of the others..." (Rossiter 320). This statement, then, creates the underlying message in support of the separation of powers, recognizing that human nature can sometimes
...