Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Can Free Will And Determinism Coexist?. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
4 pages in length. To consider the otherwise opposing aspects of free will and determinism as being complementary entities is to embrace the notion of compatibilism. Historically speaking, free will and determinism have long represented a paradoxical reality save the handful of philosophers who believed that while one or the other may take precedence in the overall scheme of man's complex behaviors, both can duly coexist within the vast realm of humanity. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCFrWlDetCo.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
paradoxical reality save the handful of philosophers who believed that while one or the other may take precedence in the overall scheme of mans complex behaviors, both can duly coexist
within the vast realm of humanity. "Thus, the commonsense conception of responsibility is that people are responsible for what they do if there are no excusing conditions or credit-eliminating
conditions present. Then, if the behave well they merit praise, while if they behave badly they merit blame. And this conception of responsibility, we should note, is fully
compatible with behaviors being causally determined" (Rachels, 2004, p. 132). Critics have long questioned the theory of free will existing within the
shadow of determinism. For as long as man has been putting forth contemplative concepts about his place in the scheme of reality, ultimately trying to figure out how and
why he exists, the concepts of free will and determinism have long been at the forefront of debate. While some like Rachel (2004) recognize the presence of both depending
upon the specific circumstances of each situation, others like Stace (2004) argue how man is fully incapable of controlling how or where his life progresses and is, therefore, under the
guidance of peripheral forces. Rachel (2004) asserts mankinds business on earth is no less bound by determinism than a winged bird foraging for
food unless the action is a direct result of anothers influence; it is at this point where ones ability to make a choice is hindered and moral responsibility diverted.
This concept spurred a great deal of controversy with many of the theorists contemporaries to the point that it was not uncommon for others to counter such philosophies. Compatibilists,
...