Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Assessment of Time Warp 3 - Clipboard Tablet Company SLP5. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 5 page paper looks at a case supplied by the student. The student is stuck in a time warp with the Clipboard Tablet Company. This paper deals with the assessment of time warp 2, with the results compared to time warp 2.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: TS65_TECTCSLP5.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
they maybe compared to the results that were seen in time warp two. Value can be gained not only by comparing the results, but also looking at some of the
reasons why there were different results obtained. 2012 In 2012 in the third time warp there were some differences. The price for the X5 remained the same, but the
research and development investment was slashed compared to time warp 2. X6 saw a slight price decrease, with the major change being an increase in the research and development. The
most significant change was seen with the X7. The price was reduced significantly, from $180 in time warp 2, to $90 in time warp 3, the research and development budget
for the X7 was also increased. Looking at the results time warp 3 was better than time warp 2 by $13,058. Table 1; Comparison of results for 2012
Time warp 2 Time warp 3 Difference 2012 478,938,000 491,996,054 13,058,054 Looking at the reason for the difference a significant element was the reduction of losses made on the
X7. The CVP analysis indicated that the X7 had a cost per unit of $55. The notes on the X7 also indicated that while the buyers were interested in the
technology, they were also sensitive to price changes. By reducing the price the demand for the product has been stimulated, the lower price means more people will want to buy
the unit (Baye, 2007; Nellis and Parker, 2006). The contribution per unit decreased, but the overall effect was to increase the total revenue received for the X7. As the product
was in the first year, and had not yet established its market it may be unrealistic to expect it to make a profit (Hooley et al, 2007), but in managing
...