Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Aristotle's "Nature Belongs To The Class Of Causes Which Act For The Sake Of Something" - Strongest Argument. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. The argument associated with Aristotle's quote stating "nature belongs to the class of causes which act for the sake of something" (Aristotle, 2001) is clearly about the inherent value of nature in light of its reason for existing. Nature, in and of itself, is a self-sufficient entity by virtue of its capacity for perpetual regeneration; if it were not of the fact that nature reinvents itself each second of each day, thereby maintaining every single form of life found upon this planet, one might readily surmise how Aristotle may not have put forth the tremendous effort to defend its legitimacy. However, his contention that "action for an end is present in things which come to be and are by nature" (Aristotle, 2001) duly illustrates the argument he strives to impart upon the masses. Bibliography lists one source.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCAristNatr.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
(Aristotle, 2001) is clearly about the inherent value of nature in light of its reason for existing. Nature, in and of itself, is a self-sufficient entity by virtue of
its capacity for perpetual regeneration; if it were not of the fact that nature reinvents itself each second of each day, thereby maintaining every single form of life found upon
this planet, one might readily surmise how Aristotle may not have put forth the tremendous effort to defend its legitimacy. However, his contention that "action for an end is
present in things which come to be and are by nature" (Aristotle, 2001) duly illustrates the argument he strives to impart upon the masses. "It is absurd to suppose
that purpose is not present because we do not observe the agent deliberating. Art does not deliberate. If the ship-building art were in the wood, it would produce the
same results by nature. If, therefore, purpose is present in art, it is present also in nature. The best illustration is a doctor doctoring himself: nature is like
that" (Aristotle, 2001). Because one can infer from Aristotles statement that anything man-made is inferior to that which is constructed by nature, the strongest objection is to defend human
composition by illustrating how equating the two are like comparing apples and oranges. The human race may not be as evolved as nature herself, but this does not inherently
mean that what accomplishments and creations man does generate are any less worthy than the myriad actions occurring in nature to realize an intended purpose. Man learns while nature
knows - this illuminating fact is what maintains the tremendous chasm between humanity and the entire natural world. If nature were not there to teach man how to survive,
...