Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Arguments Against Attacking Iraq. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 7 page paper listing several reasons that the US should not attack Iraq for the purposes of deposing Saddam Hussein. While there is no question that Hussein likely is one of the most evil individuals on the planet, removing him by force opens the US to a host of other problems. Not the least of these is the view of the US as an oppressive bully, dictating to another sovereign nation how it will conduct its affairs. Though the US certainly should be able to accomplish the removal of Hussein from power, its stated objective is to dismantle Al Qaeda. Attacking Iraq likely will only have the opposite effect in giving would-be terrorists incentive for joining with the terrorist group that is not among those that Iraq formally supports. Bibliography lists 12 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: CC6_KSiraqAgainstWar.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
his Republic that efficient government could be accomplished only when the governed gave their consent to be governed. It was Platos position that the people always had a choice
and could effect changes if they believed changes needed to be made. This leads to another point that is unclear. Hussein has now been the leader of Iraq
for more than 20 years, and the people have given no indication that they would have circumstances change. That Saddam Hussein is one
of the worlds most reliable forces of evil is not a point of debate. That Iraq represents a potential threat to the world is plausible. That the worlds
most powerful nation should plow into it to depose the leader its people have elected continuously since 1979 is unlikely. Salivating Hawks On
the editorial page of the Washington Post on August 29, Alexander Haig wrote, "Ultimately, he wrote, a US foreign policy that allows a country such as Iraq to acquire weapons
of mass destruction while violating solemn agreements is a guarantee of a world on the edge of greater terrors to come" (Massing, 2002; p. 20). Three days later, Bob
Dole had his turn in the same publication. Referring to Iraq as "runaway freight train loaded with explosives barreling toward us" (Massing, 2002; p. 20), Dole supported President Bushs
position that the US should take whatever means necessary to remove Hussein from power. He says that "we can act to derail it or wait for the crash and
deal with the resulting damage" (Massing, 2002; p. 20). It has been nearly 200 years since President James Monroe delivered a message to
...