Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Argument: Television Violence Does Not Harm Children
. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper takes the position, based on Jib Fowles’ work, that television does not harm children, and that the debate over TV violence is really a disguise for other problems we are not facing. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_HVfowles.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
takes the position, based on Jib Fowles work, that television does not harm children. Discussion In Taking sides, Fowles argues that the studies that have been done on the subject
are not conclusive, and that overall, the influence TV has on children is small (Alexander and Hanson, 2008). He believes that the research is flawed and that there has been
no conclusive link made between the violence on television and potential or actual harm done to children (Alexander and Hanson, 2008). It must be said that in making that claim,
Fowles flies in the face of almost all the research which has found such a link. But he persists in his belief that violence on television does not beget violence
in society or harm children in any way. In a 2001 article, Fowles writes, "Although television violence has never been shown to cause hostile behavior, its sinister reputation lives on.
This is because the issue masks a variety of other struggles" (2001). This is because TV is a substitute for other societal problems and clashes (Fowles, 2001). One observer said,
"The debate about children and media violence is really a debate about other things, many of which have very little to do with the media" (Fowles, 2001). Why is TV
a stand-in for the other problems, and what are those problems? The reason TV makes such a good "whipping boy" is that it is ubiquitous-theres a TV set (or more
than one) in almost every home in America (Fowles, 2001). Second, Fowles says, "if one puts on blinders, there might seem to be some correspondence between the mayhem on the
television screen and real-life aggression; both televised entertainment and the real world deal in hostilities" (Fowles, 2001). In other words, there might be enough alleged correspondence to make the charge
...