Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Apostolic Succession: Its Evolution In Roman Imagery. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
8 pages in length. When discussing the theme of apostolic succession and its evolution in Roman imagery – including architecture – from Early Christianity through the seventeenth century, the student will first want to define the notion of apostolic succession. In essence, it represents "Christ's promise to remain with His Church so that 'he who hears you hears Me'" (Kresta, 2001), thereby necessitating human agents in order to uphold this pledge. This "laying on of hands" (Sweeley, no date) established man as the conduit between the Apostles and the rest of humanity, which was inherently conveyed by way of architectural design of the time. Indeed, one might readily surmise that throughout this particular period, architecture illustrated mankind's role of divine interpretation, especially when exploring the vast and varied aspects of religious structures. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCRmnIm.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
the student will first want to define the notion of apostolic succession. In essence, it represents "Christs promise to remain with His Church so that he who hears you
hears Me" (Kresta, 2001), thereby necessitating human agents in order to uphold this pledge. This "laying on of hands" (Sweeley, no date) established man as the conduit between the
Apostles and the rest of humanity, which was inherently conveyed by way of architectural design of the time. Indeed, one might readily surmise that throughout this particular period, architecture
illustrated mankinds role of divine interpretation, especially when exploring the vast and varied aspects of religious structures. With this definition in mind, the
student will want to note that creating a building involves more than mere blueprints and concrete. Fashioning a true work of architectural illusion is really no different than an
artists canvas, in that that architect works his magic with stone, brick and stucco rather than paper or cloth. But it is the fetish of the individual architect that
gives the particular structure its inherent association to apostolic succession. The student must also realize that interpretation - a predominant element of Roman architecture influenced by apostolic succession -
was limited only as far as ones imagination would go. After all, what a particular individual likes and does not like is all a matter of personal taste and
nowhere is that more apparent than with the architectural renderings of apostolic succession. Such is the same for the type of functionalism any given structure portrayed, inasmuch as some
styles were revered while others were wildly unpopular and considered hideous, ugly clumps of stone and marble. But what is beauty? Is that not absolutely interpretive, as well?
...