Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Anton Chekov and Flannery O’Connor. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 5 page paper which compares the styles,
plots, symbolism, themes, and characterizations of Anton Chekhov and Flannery
O’Connor. Bibliography lists 10 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: JR7_RAchkoco.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
violent" (Anonymous The Dark Side of the Cross flan.html). And, in regards to Chekov, "Unlike the majority of his predecessors, Chekhov paid little attention to plot, emphasizing imagery and themes
relevant to the time of escalating civil unrest. He left the characters in his plays and stories ambiguous and open to interpretation, always emphasizing their elusive search for meaning and
pattern in their lives" (Jones bot1.html). From this most basic of definitions, concerning the writing of Flannery OConnor and Anton Chekhov, one would assume that their writing was incredibly different.
However, there are similarities between the two as it involves the various elements of writing. In the following paper we examine the similarities, as well as the differences, between Chekhov
and OConnor as it relates to style, plots symbolism, themes, and characterizations. Style "OConnors writing style is unaffected and unadorned like many of the Southern towns, characters and
townspeople she writes about. However, her subdued style delivers a pointed sword in the readers conscious, as a result, making you look closer at what she is trying to convey"
(McGovern oconnor.htm). With Chekhov we find that "He was largely responsible for the modern type of short story that depends for effect on mood and symbolism rather than on plot.
His narratives, rather than having a climax and resolution, are a thematic arrangement of impressions and ideas" (Anonymous Anton Chekhov 1860-1904 chekhov.htm). As we can see, both of these individuals
had a style that was somewhat direct, but at the same time obviously left a great deal up to the reader or the audience to discern. The style was that
which offers many possibilities and does not try to present just one perspective or one answer. Plots As mentioned in the above, Chekhov was not one that was
...