Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Animal Experimentation: Comparison Of Articles. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. The variance of acceptability with regard to animal experimentation is both grand and far-reaching; that scientific research is placed toe-to-toe with cosmetic testing speaks to two entirely different categories that, according to researchers, bear absolutely no resemblance to the useful outcome of what science bestows upon society. Moreover, the issue of rights and sentience comes into play when the concept of animal experimentation is discussed, inasmuch as mankind has routinely refused to recognize – much less grant – the moral respect toward and consideration of pain that he characteristically furnishes his own species. Bibliography lists 5 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCAnExComp.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
absolutely no resemblance to the useful outcome of what science bestows upon society. Moreover, the issue of rights and sentience comes into play when the concept of animal experimentation
is discussed, inasmuch as mankind has routinely refused to recognize - much less grant - the moral respect toward and consideration of pain that he characteristically furnishes his own species.
Delving into these issues, Accounting for Animal Experiments: Identity and Disreputable "Others" by Michael et al (1994) and The Animal Rights Controversy by Nelkin et al (1992) attempt to
illustrate the coupled elements of imbalance and injustice when it comes to the ever- hotly debated subject of animal experimentation. Michael et al (1994) address the various stages of animal
experimentation and how certain types are considered more socially and morally acceptable than others. For example, the authors cite an interview response where a British scientific researcher claimed there
to be no reason whatsoever for cosmetic testing, declaring it trivial and the very reason why experimentation overall has earned such a negative reputation. Similarly, another British researcher stated
to be "very against testing cosmetics and things on animals" (Michael et al, 1992, p. 198) yet was wholly supportive of the type of experimentation his research yielded because of
its benefit to the greater good of mankind. However, there is significant strength in this argument, inasmuch as some of the most horrific displays of the complete disregard for
animal rights are witnessed in the cosmetic laboratories. What the British practitioners allude to is the fact that many torturous experiments no longer serve a purpose; their effectiveness was
established years ago, and the need for them within the cosmetic industry is no longer necessary. By the same token, Michael et al (1994) attempt to sharpen the ever-blurred line
...