Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on An Argument Supporting U.S. Involvement in Iraq. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 5 page contention that we are justified in our role in Iraq. That justification, however, does not excuse from expanding our involvement outside the military realm and placing more emphasis on
diplomacy, economic policy, foreign aid, public diplomacy, and other aspects of international affairs that are necessary to resolve the Iraqi situation. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: AM2_PPiraqUS.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
in Iraq has been surrounded by controversy. Many, both within the U.S. and within the world as a whole, contend that the U.S. invasion of Iraq was unjustified.
The opposite argument, of course, is that this action was very much justified. The intent of this paper is to explain the problem and to present evidence that indeed
our involvement in Iraq is necessary. In doing so the counter argument will be refuted and a solution proposed. The George W.
Bush Administration justified that engagement both on the basis of the threat that Sadaam Hussein and his terrorist connections presented to the rest of the world, on the basis of
a presumed existence of weapons of mass destruction, and on the human rights injustices that were occurring in Iraq. Those that oppose that decision contend Salaam was not directly
responsible for the September 11, 2001 attacks in the U.S. and that our retaliation against him is unjust. They further argue that no weapons of mass destruction have been
located and that our involvement in Iraq has done little to correct human rights injustices. It has been demonstrated time and time again, however, that the Salaam regime has
many noted ties to al Qaeda (Whitelaw, 2003; Constable, 2003). The media, of course, has been the primary objector to the contention that
our actions in Iraq have been justified. That same media has been particularly critical of the George W. Bush administration in general, however. Their depiction of the circumstances
surrounding the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has reflected their obvious dislike for that administration, a dislike which in actuality extended to the George Bush Senior administration as well.
...