Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on American Military Retaliation For Terrorism. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
5 pages in length. Political analysts have effectively addressed the idea of force as the primary element of war; inasmuch as force is the primary vehicle for political terrorists, it stands to reason that if the element of force did not exist, there would be no motivation for battle. With this in mind, it is relatively easy to apply this concept to the notion of terrorism and the manner by which the United States responds to such acts, since the ultimate goal of any terrorist is to obtain the desired commodity through drastic and often deadly means of force. This, then, justifies any and all retaliation that the United States may take in order to uphold national honor and global power. By understanding this obvious correlation, the student can effectively argue that President Clinton's decision to bomb Sudan and Afghanistan in 1998 was part and parcel to America's ongoing effort to quell the perpetuating terrorist activities. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCAmTer.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
it stands to reason that if the element of force did not exist, there would be no motivation for battle. With this in mind, it is relatively easy to
apply this concept to the notion of terrorism and the manner by which the United States responds to such acts, since the ultimate goal of any terrorist is to obtain
the desired commodity through drastic and often deadly means of force. This, then, justifies any and all retaliation that the United States may take in order to uphold national
honor and global power. By understanding this obvious correlation, the student can effectively argue that President Clintons decision to bomb Sudan and Afghanistan in 1998 was part and parcel
to Americas ongoing effort to quell the perpetuating terrorist activities. When the student examines whether or not the bombings were effective, it must be approached in a broader spectrum than
merely determining if such an attack helped to avert subsequent assaults; rather, the extent to which Clintons decision can be considered a positive step toward subjugating other terrorist groups from
partaking of the same activities as Afghanistan is much more valuable than mistakenly believing that Americas retaliation might be influential enough to completely halt the terrorist behavior of bin Laden.
Clearly, President Clinton ordered the bombing as a means by which to send a message to the rest of the world: meddle with America and there will be a
hefty price to pay. The student might readily surmise that the impact of Clintons domestic scandal had much to do with his decision to strike, inasmuch as the president was
looking for something with an international flavor that would effectively draw attention away from his issues and place them squarely upon the shoulders of an immediate global situation. While
...