Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Ageism In the 1990s. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
Ageism In the 1990s: A 4-page descriptive paper outlining the problem of ageism in employment. Included are the specific practices the term covers, what has been done to combat it and how age discrimination stands as we go into the 21st century. Lists 4 references
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: KE9_99ageism.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
word in the lexicon and a new concern for aging workers everywhere: ageism. While the word properly refers to discrimination in any form against individuals from a specific age group,
and can apply to discrimination and stereotyping against the young, it is used almost exclusively in a work setting to describe unfair practices aimed at those over a certain age,
usually 40 or 50 (Mountaingrove, 1993). The practice has been banned by a number of federal regulations, and widely condemned by social activists, and to a certain extent this has
served to reverse the trend in the United States. Yet it still remains a significant problem and presents a troubling prospect to many employed in U.S. industry. It all started
in the late 1970s, when the youth mania of the Baby Boom generation combined with the stringent downsizing of the 80s to produce a new phenomenon. Aging workers, middle management,
and even executives at corporations found their jobs in jeopardy. It was a particular shock to those over 50 who had chided the hippies and the youth radicals for being
unable to defer gratification. Put in your time, they said, take your licks, pay your dues in low-paying jobs, work hard and you will be rewarded in the end with
a good salary, job security and a life of leisure. Now, they found that their companies, when faced with the necessity for trimming costs, were eyeing them and their positions
hungrily (Reingold, 1999). Part of it was simple mathematics. A company could hire two, three, or even four entry-level workers for the amount they were paying for one 20- or
25-year employee (Reingold, 1999). These employees had accrued a vast amount of benefits, sick days, paid leave, paid holidays, bonuses and pension. Then there was the sociological factor. In the
...