Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Against Globalization. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 7 page paper that first defines globalization and then discusses opposition to globalization. There is a large and diverse group of individuals and organizations that strongly oppose globalization on a number of grounds, one of which is the destruction of the environment. This is the objection that involves the IMF and World Bank directly. The points against globalization are outlined and discussed. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: MM12_PGantigl.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
in goods and services and of international capital flows, and also through the more rapid and widespread diffusion of technology" (CountryScope, nd). * A more encompassing definition was offered by
Friedman: "Globalization is a state of the world involving networks of interdependence at multi-continental distances with multiple economic/financial, political, national security, environmental, social/cultural and technological linkages among nation states, markets
and individuals" (CountryScope, nd). * Greider used a more descriptive approach: "Globalization [is like a] wondrous new machine,...that reaps as it destroys. ...huge and mobile, ...like the machines of
modern agriculture, but vastly more complicated and powerful. ....running over open terrain and ignoring familiar boundaries. ... As it goes, the machine throws off enormous rows of wealth and bounty
while it leaves behind great furrows of wreckage. . . .[The machine is] modern capitalism driven by the imperatives of global industrial revolution, [creating] the drama of a free-running economic
system that is reordering the world" (CountryScope, nd). It is safe to say that all definitions and descriptions address trade between and among countries and development in underdeveloped and
undeveloped countries. The global market knows no boundaries. Capital flows between nations more freely. Information is exchanged more freely and also more quickly. People also move between nations with greater
ease. This has all happened since the end of the Cold War (CountryScope, nd). Reports about globalization have most often described the benefits to undeveloped and underdeveloped nations.
More people are working. Poverty levels have decreased. Nations are exploiting their natural resources. And, so on. Given these facts, and there are data to support these claims, why is
there a sudden backlash against globalization? And, who is leading this anti-globalization movement? It is only in the last couple or three years that there have been highly publicized movements
...