Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Advantages In Taking A Deliberative Approach To Conflicts Of Culture. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
6 pages in length. The long-standing cultural conflicts that have permeated an otherwise civil society have been responsible for some short-sighted, ineffective resolutions to a problem that requires much more consideration to mend than the strong-arm tactics historically applied. The extent to which conflicts of culture are based more realistically within the context of intracultural composition instead of intercultural is both grand and far-reaching; that the notion of deliberative democracy stands to right the wrongs created by knee-jerk response to cultural minorities and their alleged place in society speaks of a much more ethical approach where the common denominator is moral good. Bibliography lists 12 sources.
Page Count:
7 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCConfCult.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
than the strong-arm tactics historically applied. The extent to which conflicts of culture are based more realistically within the context of intracultural composition instead of intercultural is both grand
and far-reaching; that the notion of deliberative democracy stands to right the wrongs created by knee-jerk response to cultural minorities and their alleged place in society speaks of a much
more ethical approach where the common denominator is moral good. According to Deveaux (2003), the consequences of cultural conflict being more readily based
within an intracultural rather than intercultural composition is that it is indicative of "the political and practical interests of factions of communities much more than deep moral differences" (pp. 780-807).
Moreover, as Eisenberg et al (2005) point out, James Madison considered factions a critical component for maintaining democratic freedom. These factions, the authors note, in conjunction with the protection
of freedom of association, guaranteed "no enduring majority would dominate over any minority because, in order to advance their interests, factions constantly form and re-form alliances with other factions" (p.
1). As such, deliberative democracy seeks to reformulate the venerable reality of excluding populations of marginalized and otherwise ignored groups in the fundamental operations of a given community, not
the least of which includes issues of law, politics and economic strength. In short, the voting component of an otherwise economic-based society - where the aforementioned groups are isolated
from truly having a voice even though they do cast a ballot - is exchanged for one where public deliberation resides at the core of lawmaking and other crucial decisions
where peoples lives are concerned. "Whereas multicultural citizenship in theory has focused on minority and group-differentiated rights, multicultural citizenship in practice has been framed in terms of the universal
...