Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Adolph Hitler, Pius IX, Mahatma Gandhi, Winston Churchill And Chiang Kai-Shek: Impact Comparison. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
6 pages in length. When comparing the political and social impact of Adolph Hitler, Pius IX, Mahatma Gandhi, Winston Churchill and Chiang Kai-Shek, one can easily distinguish the line that exists between and among these varied leaders. To compare Hitler to Gandhi is to place a lion and a lamb in the same confined space and watch to see who comes out the victor. Pius IX, as well, represents misdirected authority, while Kai-Shek stands firm in an autocratic society. Churchill's political and social contributions lean toward the quest for complete abolition of tyrannical rule, with Hitler at the top of his list. The writer discusses how the impact each man has had upon the world as a whole has been nothing short of significant. Bibliography lists 6 sources.
Page Count:
6 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCgandi.doc
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
Churchill and Chiang Kai-Shek, one can easily distinguish the line that exists between and among these varied leaders. To compare Hitler to Gandhi is to place a lion and
a lamb in the same confined space and watch to see who comes out the victor. Pius IX, as well, represents misdirected authority, while Kai-Shek stands firm in an
autocratic society. Churchills political and social contributions lean toward the quest for complete abolition of tyrannical rule, with Hitler at the top of his list. Indeed, the impact
each man has had upon the world as a whole has been nothing short of significant. Chiang Kai-Shek is remembered throughout world history
as an authoritarian. It can readily be argued that autocratic rule was part and parcel of his peoples social existence. Inherent to Kai-Sheks endorsement of an autocratic system
was the desire to place all political and economic control in the hands of but a few of the upper class citizens, while forcing all the rest to abide by
the whims of this appointed sovereignty. Kai-Sheks position on social standing was to wholeheartedly embrace a despotic government. One can readily argue that he represented those who took
a particular disliking to anything but the totalitarian leadership, deeming all others unworthy of participation in their own community. If a governmental system did not have complete and exclusive
control over its constituency, then it was not aspiring to Kai-Sheks idea of the perfect system of administration. However, in spite of his desirous attempts, Kai-Shek experienced great difficulty
pursuing his autocratic quest. "Although Chiangs regime was traditionally authoritarian, it never restored the oppression of the imperial era: Despite, or probably because of, the official corruption and ineptitude
...