Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on Administrator Dilemma. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
3 pages in length. Nick Klaws is well within his rights - both by policy and ethics - to suspend Joe Blow's account for failing to uphold university protocol that states school computers are to be used only for school-related reasons. That Joe was conducting personal business by earning money from a school computer gave Nick enough reason to pull rank and remove his privileges. Surveillance, even though significantly intrusive, plays an integral role in saving society from itself, given the fact that people like Joe are taking less and less responsibility for their own actions and how they may create a damaging influence upon others, a pertinent reason why this is a computer ethics problem and not just a common ethics problem. No bibliography.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCAdminDilem.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
That Joe was conducting personal business by earning money from a school computer gave Nick enough reason to pull rank and remove his privileges. Surveillance, even though significantly
intrusive, plays an integral role in saving society from itself, given the fact that people like Joe are taking less and less responsibility for their own actions and how they
may create a damaging influence upon others, a pertinent reason why this is a computer ethics problem and not just a common ethics problem. If Nick were so inclined, he
could probably have Joe suspended - or worse - from school altogether inasmuch as tolerance for such blatant disregard for computer policy is a critical component of todays academia.
Indeed, the potential for flagrant abuse is both grand and far-reaching; for Nick to suspend Joe from computer use is a logical and expected reaction to someone who apparently holds
little respect for school policy. In contrast, Joe grasps at straws trying to defend being caught doing what he knows was wrong, yet his ego compels him to challenge
the validity and legality of Nicks decision. The absence of defining law in this area gives way to the guiding force of university policy that clearly states personal business
is not to be conducted upon school computers. Nick had more than enough reason to suspect Joe of inappropriate usage; given the fact that a major part of Nicks
responsibility is to forestall cheating, his actions were ethically warranted in light of Joes questionable activities. Joe counters Nicks actions by citing how at its core, privacy comes down to
the right to keep secrets, which are quite telltale of how each individual defines his or her truest sense of self. He argues how the issue of computers and
...