Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on “Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution” by James McPherson. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A
5 page analysis of James McPherson’s work “Abraham Lincoln and the Second American
Revolution.” No additional sources cited.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: JR7_RAmcphrs.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
United States. And, at the center of that war stands one man, Abraham Lincoln. Because of this there has been a great deal written on Lincoln and his actual level
of involvement in the war itself. James McPhersons book "Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution" is a book that offers up 7 different essays that look at Lincoln and
look at the war as a second revolution. The following paper analyzes this work. Conclusion The first essay presented in the work discusses how the Civil War was
truly a radical event that altered the face and structure of the United States. The nation went from a slave holding country to a free one and that is a
very powerful change that perhaps speaks of revolutionary change. In addition, the essay illustrates how the political power in the nation shifted from the South, where all the agricultural wealth
was maintained, to the North, where the wealth was perhaps seen in the political minds and the Industrial Revolutions influences. In this particular essay McPherson appears to be particularly
intrigued by the change in how we looked at government. Before the Civil War people were interested in a world that protected them from negative government, where the people had
the rights to rid themselves of the negative liberty. But, after the Civil War the approach became one that focused on protection rather than government oppression. In the second
essay we are given a look at Lincolns role in the revolution itself. McPherson argues that Lincoln was actually The second essay discusses Lincolns role as the leader of the
revolution. Lincoln, McPherson argues, was very much of a practical revolutionary himself. He looked at what was necessary in the government and the nation. He did not have a powerfully
...