Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on ALTERNATIVE ASSESSMENTS FOR ELEMENTARY STUDENTS. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 8 page paper discusses the alternative testing methods for the Elementary student. The philosophy of Vygotsky and scaffoding are examined. Statistics from National Testing Center, offered. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
8 pages (~225 words per page)
File: D0_MBalttest.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
They can sometimes offer insight as to why something is not working in an individual classroom. However, it could be said, that when it comes down to it, the only
one that can make a difference in the classroom is the relationship between the teacher and the students. And, to that end, then, the teacher should be the best qualified
to assess the level of achievement and readiness in her student. It has been determined that the standardized tests of the past were highly discriminatory, both in race and gender.
Given this, then, if a teacher, a schools system, wants to truly know the achievement of a student, alternative methods of testing must be employed and researched. How many times
will a student be asked to completely fill in the bubble that indicates his or her answer? How many times will a promising student be labeled as deficient intellectually because
of a test scoring that indicates this specification? It can be said that the evolution of many things has taken place over the last fifty years, but that intelligence tests
have not. Studies have shown that IQ scores can be changed by training, nutrition, or simply by having more friendly people administer the test(National Center, 2004). In reality, IQ tests
are nothing more than a type of achievement test which primarily measures knowledge of standard English and exposure to the cultural experiences of middle class whites(National Center, 2004). For years
philosophers have tried to come to grips with the concept of intelligence. Later, a handful of psychologists divided it into three primary factors: academic intelligence; social intelligence and practical intelligence(Hausfather
1996). This three-prong approach may explain to some extent why some children, who fail miserably at school, go on to have successful careers, and vice versa. Scholastic aptitude is not
...