Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on A New Neshaminy High School. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
A 9 page paper which examines the pros and cons of
building a new high school in Neshaminy, PA. The paper also provides an outline of the
subject matter. The paper argues in favor of building a new high school. Bibliography
lists 7 sources.
Page Count:
9 pages (~225 words per page)
File: JR7_RAnesham.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
This controversy has been going on, in one way or another, for perhaps several years as the old high school seems to be in constant need of repair. As such
there have been people fighting to get the funding to build a new high school. However, there seems to be a great deal of political power that is insisting that
a new school not be built. The following paper examines this controversy, discussing both sides and arguing that a new school should be built. The Cons As one
could expect, there are powerful arguments against the building of the new high school. Perhaps the largest problem seems to be, or would seem to be, the cost of building
a new high school. Interestingly enough, however, many people had encouraged the sale of bonds to build the school. This resulted in several powerful figures stating they would start litigation
if the bond sales went through. The information available to this particular writer does not detail all the specifics, but according to introductory sentences from many newspaper articles, there are
those who oppose the new building vehemently, though without apparent cause. One such reference follows: "If current Neshaminy school board members vote to borrow money to build a high school,
their replacements say theyll try to stop the loan with a lawsuit if necessary. The three challengers who were guaranteed board seats during the primary and incumbent Richard Eccles faxed
a letter on Friday to two board attorneys, the superintendent, and two bond underwriters, warning them that to proceed would result in litigation" (Patrick, October 14, 2003; B01). Two
days later we note that "A letter from three incoming school board members and an incumbent threatening a lawsuit if bonds were sold for a new school apparently led two
...