Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on A Look at the Role of the Historian. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 5 page paper examines the role of history writers. Controversies are explored. Bibliography lists 4 sources.
Page Count:
5 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA909his.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
it is history. History is something that already occurred, so it seems silly to argue about it. On the other hand, history is written by people. Even the Bible, that
some religious sects take literally, is subject to various interpretations. History is limited because even writing of the past are subject to error and they can no longer be scrutinized.
All of the authors are dead. There cannot be clarification. Historians must interpret the past much like sociologists interpret the present. Still, many historians rely on facts. For example, if
a war broke out on a certain day, that day is set in stone. Unless something comes out that completely challenges what had happened in the past, the day never
changes. It is a historical fact. Yet, much about what happens on a particular day may be subject to interpretation and challenged. For example, there may be disagreement on which
General said what to whom. Because there are no living witnesses, one has to rely on the writings of the day. A historian may comb newspaper clippings, diaries, artifacts and
so forth, and draw conclusions. Clearly, that does not always lead to an objective truth. History is something that is subject to different definitions. That is, different people see
history in different ways. There is a debate over presentism where there is disagreement over how much of a distance historians should have to the subject matter1. When it comes
to the logic of traditional historians there is the idea that his presence is problematic and that the historian should seek to overcome it; however, some who support post-structuralism see
the placement of the present as something that should be included2. That is, for some time, historians would try to write objective books as if what they were reporting were
...