Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on A Fictitious Discussion Between Hobbes and Kant. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 3 page paper examines the issue of enlightenment and supposes how a discussion on the subject might go between these two philosophers. Ideas about human nature are included.
Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Page Count:
3 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RT13_SA642KaH.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
what is known to have been said. These appear in quotations. A moderator is also included in this fictitious discussion, based on the writings of these philosophers: Moderator: Greetings,
Mr. Kant and Mr. Hobbes. As we start this intriguing debate, I would like to begin with a discussion on nature. Mr. Kant, what do you think people are like
in nature? Kant: "As nature has uncovered from under this hard shell the seed for which she most tenderly cares - the propensity and vocation to free thinking - this
gradually works back upon the character of the people, who thereby gradually become capable of managing freedom; finally, it affects the principles of government, which finds it to its advantage
to treat men, who are now more than machines, in accordance with their dignity" (Kant, 1784). Moderator: That is quite an intricate answer. It seems as if you
see freedom as essential for man. What do you have to say for yourself, Mr. Hobbes? Hobbes: "THE right of nature, which writers commonly call jus naturale, is the liberty
each man hath to use his own power as he will himselff or the preservation of his own nature; that is to say, of his own life; and consequently, of
doing anything which, in his own judgement and reason, he shall conceive to be the aptest means thereunto" (Hobbes, 1997). Moderator: In many ways, it seems as if both of
you are saying the same thing. Man has the right to do as he likes, his freedoms are guaranteed, and this is sacrosanct. Is that what you are both saying?
Are you seeing freedom as critical? Kant: Not exactly. Still, men should be able to make their own choices based on their own individual mortality. Hobbes: I agree with
...