Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on A Comparison of Windows Server 2003 and Windows Server 2008. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
This 4 page paper concludes that for corporations that are large and need remote access and are concerned about security, the upgrade certainly pays, but Windows Server 2003 stands on its own and is certainly viable even in 2010. The two products are compared and contrasted. Bibliography lists 3 sources.
Page Count:
4 pages (~225 words per page)
File: RG13_SA109wdw.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
had been a 2000 version (Warren, 2008). When comparing and contrasting the 2008 and 2003 versions, it is largely the same type of software with new features. For some,
the upgrade does pay off, but for others, the differences are not really worthwhile. There are also many versions of this product. For example, there is something called Windows Small
Business Server 2008 and this product is geared for firms that have at least five but not more than seventy-five computers (Valim, 2008). A higher-level version supports the use of
up to 250 users (Valim, 2008). All versions available when the product would release are as follows: Windows Server 2008 Standard Edition, Windows Server 2008 Enterprise Edition, Windows Server 2008
Datacenter Edition, Windows Web Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 for Itanium-based Systems (Matthews, 2008). Aside from the enhanced business versions, Windows Server 2003 has been widely used and the 2008
version would provide an opportunity for an update. The newer version provides more flexibility, greater security, and it is easier to use (Warren, 2008). Windows Server 2008 offers excellent protection
as well (Warren, 2008). Warren (2008) remarks that someone happy with Windows Server 2003 really does not have to upgrade because the newer version is geared to a certain type
of client. Warren (2008) explains which type of client might fare well with the updated version: "On the other hand, if you have a need for a Windows Server Core
only installation, network access protection, read-only domain controllers, built-in virtualization, scripting, or any other new feature, migrating to Windows Server 2008 makes sense." The author elaborates on his comment, stating
that all domain controllers would ideally be in a single server room and have unlimited amounts of bandwidth (Warren, 2008). In other words, that is the ideal. He goes on
...