Here is the synopsis of our sample research paper on 1937 Occupation Of Nanking: Historical Revisionism. Have the paper e-mailed to you 24/7/365.
Essay / Research Paper Abstract
14 pages in length. What if the inhumanity that took place at Nanking was recorded as being a much greater catastrophe than it actually was? Is it not possible for those who witnessed the event could have guesstimated, misperceived or simply -- but unwittingly -- provided incorrect information in the heat of emotional upheaval? This is when historical revisionism serves as a saving grace for the legacy of those who died. Bibliography lists 15 sources.
Page Count:
14 pages (~225 words per page)
File: LM1_TLCnanking.rtf
Buy This Term Paper »
 
Unformatted sample text from the term paper:
power words hold in relation to skewing reality is the key to knowing how selected details are perceived from a viewpoint of adulterated depiction. Such distinctions have been overlooked
to the point of being immersed within the very infrastructure of what contemporary society believes is true based only upon what is typically a handful of revisionists contend to be
the historical factsi ii and even to the point of denial.iii iv However, what if the inhumanity that took place was recorded as being a much greater catastrophe than
it actually was? Is it not possible for those who witnessed the event could have guesstimated, misperceived or simply -- but unwittingly -- provided incorrect information in the heat
of emotional upheaval? This is when historical revisionism serves as a saving grace for the legacy of those who died.v II. LEGITIMATE OR PROPAGANDA?
The question is not so much whether the event did or did not take place as it is to what extent the event did occur. Those
who claim outright the Holocaust never happened do not have a shred of evidence to prove this point, inasmuch as first generation family members who are still alive have eye
witness testimony to state the contrary. However, to argue a claim is inflated to the point of invalidating what has been recorded as more significant than it was is
to make a valuable contribution to the preservation of truth and not the act of a heretic. Those who take others to task when proof exists to challenge their
claim serve a purpose in the greater scheme of historical events, no matter how they may be perceived as naysayers in the face of a global community.
...